Anti Bottom Feeding Idea

Muh Dude

No castles gained when hitting below 75% your own strength. Especially if CLI goes through you wouldn't be able to get a friend to help break them. I would bet in well over half my defenses, I was 50-70% the attackers size. Even after the penalty was put in. I like the % penalty. It helps. But in the end you still lose a big chuck of your kingdom and they'll rebuild any lost troops faster cause they're (up to) 2x your size.. Plus several people have shamelessly stated that since there's still a penalty, might as well max it out. Cause "stra-tuh-jee" .. Well then, lets change the stakes.

This isn't my idea but I'm too lazy to go back through posts and find out who said it. I just really agree

Lord Thane

This is a pretty good idea, the only change I would make is to make it a % chance, something like 50/50 chance you can win a castle hitting below 70%. It's better than a straight cap.

Muh Dude

Lord Thane That's a good compromise. I'll add it to the poll

Jaxx

Shouldnt win a castle if its a retal?

saadht

Can we add another one, 50/50 chance unless it's a retal. Retal should be 100% chance.

Muh Dude

saadht yeah, I figure since retals already ignore the penalty they should ignore this too

CyberPtra

saadht

But what if the hit was unsuccessful in getting a castle? You attack and do not gain a castle, but then you get hit back and 100% to lose castle

Jets

CyberPtra that's the risk of attacking. It's unpredictable. Nothing should be a guarantee otherwise everything can be exploited.

trupheus

CyberPtra

You failed. Get ready to pay for not being strong enough

CyberPtra

trupheus

the idea was even if you are successful at attacking, only 50% chance of getting castle…. But 100% chance lose castle if you fail defence. So less incentive to attack first.