No points mentioned are against the Thardferr rules or policies. (Assume might be pressumed to be against individual own rules)
No points made are to add value or to mprove the game, rather than some sort of name calling or self proclamation of higher status.
While I agree that castle passing is a controversial tactic (personally think shouldn't be allowed). Currently this is not against the game policies and unless revered by the keepers will always be still up for debate.
Also added points in the other topic that could reduce or elimate this being possible in the future.
Point being both sides got great strategists and players, which would make a great watch if this was a province focused game rather than political one.
From a simplistic view, we should be putting our energy in adding value to the game and give suggestions how to improve it, so it makes it more joyous to all, rather than name calling behaviour (however it is precieved by most).
To the great battles in the game and healthy and constructive debate outside of it 🍻
