Wizards to Defend

King Haybol

skigglez Sounds like you're just unlucky in TS. Even our caster has a lot of failed TS sometimes. 😅😅😅

trupheus

Trying to understand. For offensive spells, is potency of an offensive spell determined by schools of the offensive caster vs schools of the defender and total land. Basically if I have 100 schools and I’m casting against a kingdom with 100 land and 50 schools, my spell has a potency of .5:1. Second is my success rate which is my amount of wizards used vs their amount of wizards defending? Something along those lines?

Lord Thane

skigglez the resistance isn't like a hard cutoff based on chance, it's more like a handicap where they get set to -40 points and the caster has to push their combined modifiers to reach +100 points to successfully cast. Whereas other races would start at 0 points and the caster has to reach 100 points to succeed... That's a really simple way of explaining it, but functionally that's sort of how it goes. It's possible with enough wizards and schools that they can reach 100% success rate every time.

trupheus

And is it possible to use enough wizard to overcome said resistance. So amount of wizards needed to cast offensively against a human would need to be less than against a dwarf?

Lord Thane

trupheus yes it is much easier to reach casting success against a human than a dwarf, just because you need less wizards to reach the threshold.

For potencies it takes into account your school/wiz and the defenders school/wiz, a random roll for damage multiplier, and number of peasants the target has with a limit to how many can die in one go. The casting success chance is also used in the calc for potency as well.

For Wine who got hit with 16k fireball, it was probably an incredibly lucky roll (this is a 300 sided dice, lol), and the elf was probably stacked on all the other modifiers (like casting on someone smaller).

trupheus

Lord Thane

Soooo an elf with 4:1 schools casting FB with 4000 wiz against a dwarf with no schools and about 40 less land, to be expected to kill 23k.

Also, that was cast inside my retal and it gave him a retal. 🙁

Lord Thane

trupheus yes that's possible, with a really good roll, like a critical hit roll lol

skigglez

trupheus
Like I said, was to be determined if the fireball was worth giving up a retal. Now if only we had TS give retals too things would be much more interesting for the low KS pocket casters

Cora

skigglez Why should TS give a retal?? They don’t do any damage when cast. All they give is information.

skigglez

Cora
It’s my pipe dream haha. There’s a few low KS kingdoms (1/3 the KS) that run all wizards that are casting multiple TS on our group and we have no recourse against it. Even on our elves who are running wizards they basically never fail. Seems like an issue to me because they are able to TS us while in protection too - a massive advantage for that group in my opinion. Especially when one of the kingdoms doing it is Haybol’s multi (proven in another thread), he never does an attack without it.

King Haybol

Cora I agree with this! They offer purely information, and nothing beyond that. 🫣🫣🫣

Mack10

skigglez
I dont agree a TS should give retal. Most that stay small are effective early game by staying low and casting. Especially with this Castle% hits.... If I was elf this round I would purposely stay with 2-3 castles due to this terrible rule and the ability to be selling Pots in the market to stockpile resources.

However I do agree Haybol has a multi/friend who is playing only to help him in E7

trupheus

skigglez

If you keep failing TS on your elf, do something different. Your schools per land are too low for the amount of wiz you’re using. Use more wiz, get more schools, or both. You failed a TS on 2 elves in the same tick. Learn. Get better.

TS shouldn’t give a retal.

That offensive damaging spells give a retal when they can’t take a castle doesn’t make sense to me. They can’t target military. They can’t take a castle. They can’t take land. Yet they give a retal that can cost a castle? Especially considering what’s necessary for them to be a real threat. If the caster can’t take a castle with a spell why do they have one at risk?

Alas, we’re off topic in this thread. Wizards should provide some kind of defense only attack power. It’s not going to stop anyone it’s just going to give them a little sting when someone decides to hit a caster.

King Haybol

Mack10 E7? Who is he? I really don't remember. 😅😅😅

skigglez

Mack10
It is a huge advantage to have that many TS because the account is set up purely to do so, whereas real accounts have to use their wizards for other things. Haybol might think it isn’t an advantage to have constant information about multiple kingdoms, but it really is, especially since the racial resistances for dwarf and gnome essentially do nothing. If it wasn’t an advantage they wouldn’t have multi kingdoms set up to do exactly what they’re doing.

King Haybol

skigglez You've got the wrong person! I'm not OTEN of Jerjermon in E7, and I don't have a multi setup. 🫡🫡🫡 Just so you know, I stock up on a lot of MPs from the market to make up for my spellcasting, particularly since I'm without wizzard now. 🥸🥸🥸

Cora

skigglez the racial resistances are working. I failed casting on a dwarf using the same ratio that I use for a gnome. That extra 5% resistance made a difference in my calculations. I should have accounted for that, but I didn’t. So the cast failed. I understand the frustration of having multiple TS casted on you, but it doesn’t mean that it should have a retal for it.

skigglez

King Haybol
You know exactly who it is, you accidentally posted from the wrong forum account dude. It’s fine the devs said it’s legit, so you get to keep doing it. But just know that everyone thinks it’s extremely scummy. Almost feel bad for you that you don’t have the confidence to play a legit round

skigglez

Cora
Agree to disagree i suppose

King Haybol

skigglez Wait, what? 🧐🧐🧐 Every single one of my attacks is legit, and I'm expanding organically, without any resource assistance from my alliance! Seriously, the only 'help' I requested was that Truesight spell. Lol.

To clear up any doubt, I used Truesight (TS) for my personal use previously because I run schools. Here's the history for your reference.

Spell Target Cast Time Duration
Truesight Adamastor Of MAGNNIFICUM in Lithar #3 2025-06-14 15:13:08 One-time
Truesight Talic Of Bloodforge in Khardfee #13 2025-06-14 12:05:47 One-time
Truesight Mugnor Frothbeard Of Kegspire in Khardfee #13 2025-06-14 06:38:45 One-time
Truesight Katy Perry Of Astronaut in Edilar #13 2025-06-14 06:06:34 One-time
Truesight Buttmud Brooks Of Bowelburg Vale in Edilar #13 2025-06-14 04:11:32 One-time
Truesight Katy Perry Of Astronaut in Edilar #13 2025-06-13 23:58:54 One-time
Truesight Katy Perry Of Astronaut in Edilar #13 2025-06-13 21:17:09 One-time
Truesight Jets Of Independence in Khardfee #19 2025-06-13 20:43:19 One-time
Truesight Buttmud Brooks Of Bowelburg Vale in Edilar #13 2025-06-13 03:08:55 One-time
Truesight Jets Of Independence in Khardfee #19 2025-06-13 03:03:37 One-time

skigglez

trupheus
Offensive spells like fireball and earthquake should absolutely grant a retal. That fireball you cast on me wiped out 3/4 of my population, that is extremely powerful and can cripple a kingdom. You can also cast them on people in protection. Casters shouldn’t get to hold that kind of power over the races that aren’t able to run wizards.

« Previous Page Next Page »