trupheus
If that's how you want to spend the round, then go for it. The rest of the players who want to actually play the game will do so without having to deal with castle passing. There is no perfect scenario, but I would rather see a round of it implemented to test it out. If you end up being right and it puts the game in a worse spot than before, we can always discuss reverting or other alternatives. The only thing we shouldn't be doing is not explore other options. Just my opinion, could be skewed because i despise the big alliance part of Thard and just want a change.
Important Battle/Play Style Poll For Pre-Re/Castle-Pass
I like the ideas and CLI thing, but this will surely makes the game boring. You know the excitement when it's your turn to gang bang someone to take your retal, and the excitement when seeing the guy is totally dead, and the feeling, the frustration when this also happens to you.
I like this game because of the mixed emotions that we can let out.
So sorry, I choose no to this.
xiAo-Shin Star
You would have a different opinion if you weren't part of one of the big alliances participating in the gang banging of people that don't have large friend groups in the game.
trupheus yeah it's frustrating when there's been dozens of hours of discussion on a topic, only to have some jagoffs come along without having spent more than a few minutes considering it before spouting off some illogical bullshit scenarios.
Yeah if 2 people want to perpetually circle jerk each other with CLI all game, sure why not let them, it isn't hurting anybody else. And how are they supposed to "grow to the top" when they have no armies and are constantly losing buildings from attacking each other? And for 3 months they're supposed to keep strict timing of protections? If 2 people do that commitment, they deserve whatever rank they get.
- Edited
Boss Cli B is nice but........... wt if KD A is 100k and he KD B 75k.. theres only a slim chance KD
B can win against KD A cause he can retrain more... lets put Kd a and B are same races also..
But if u put buff in KD B. All training , armory , resouces and etc much better.. and Kd B also has - buff in training much better
For the record I really don't care if CLI gets implemented or not. I only worked on it as a benefit to the majority of players who cried for a solution to an old problem.
I put prolly 70 hours into the battle engine and I'm not even going to get to use it. I'm not making any attacks next round because I don't want anyone feeling that they got cheated or abused by admins.
So whether CLI is implemented or not doesn't matter to me, I just want whatever is going to give the best user experience for the majority of players. I will defend CLI against ignorance or misinformation though, because players affected by the decision need to know what they're voting on despite the best efforts of the very players CLI is working against.
- Edited
Eri okay, now let's flip the script on your scenario - how is the 75k kd supposed to defend itself against a 100k kd who also has a buddy helping him pre-re you? Now you're double fucked... CLI would at least put you on a 1v1, where your strategy can give you a fighting chance. And the 75k kingdom gets a KS buff to help kill the 100k kd troops faster.
Please dismiss our concerns and allow us to abuse it, but then it’s not an abuse it’s a design flaw and completely legal.
Deal?
It’s much easier to show than explain in words.
saadht I shouldn't respond to such a dumb response, but sure I'll take the bait.
If you could use this strategy with CLI, why didn't you already use it when there was no CLI? It's 10X easier to use that strategy without CLI in the way.
Because the one receiving castles was not getting prot. He could be hit by the others. Now he also gets protection.
- Edited
saadht well that's dumb, he could just let one of his buddies hit him for protection, duhhhhhh.
So the circle jerks feed the 1 guy a bunch of castles, then he gives 1 back for protection.
Duhhhhh
Not gonna respond, it’s much easier to show than to explain.
saadht if there was a legitimate flaw for us to consider, I'd be happy to hear it. So far, there's nothing.
CLI doesn't make this made up scenario easier, it makes it harder. CLI doesn't make this scenario possible, it's already currently possible.
- Edited
Lord Thane Well, I have in my queue avoid inter-province attacks, would be a little more difficult to adjust the Leo's scenario
That would be helpful. Because less incentive in a province based play. It is only possible within a province where players are well-organized or via multi. Disabling inter-province attack has been proposed many times now but i thought didn't get much popularity. It makes much more sense now with CLI.
Oh God, CLI B and No are 32% each.
I haven’t seen such polarization since Britain decided to commit suicide in 2016…
I've never seen such a meltdown. What a pity that Thardferr would come after 20 years just to see this yapping.
saadht I'm counting A + B together since it's both CLI, so vote is actually | 12 yes | 10 no |