Important Battle/Play Style Poll For Pre-Re/Castle-Pass
For the record I really don't care if CLI gets implemented or not. I only worked on it as a benefit to the majority of players who cried for a solution to an old problem.
I put prolly 70 hours into the battle engine and I'm not even going to get to use it. I'm not making any attacks next round because I don't want anyone feeling that they got cheated or abused by admins.
So whether CLI is implemented or not doesn't matter to me, I just want whatever is going to give the best user experience for the majority of players. I will defend CLI against ignorance or misinformation though, because players affected by the decision need to know what they're voting on despite the best efforts of the very players CLI is working against.
- Edited
Eri okay, now let's flip the script on your scenario - how is the 75k kd supposed to defend itself against a 100k kd who also has a buddy helping him pre-re you? Now you're double fucked... CLI would at least put you on a 1v1, where your strategy can give you a fighting chance. And the 75k kingdom gets a KS buff to help kill the 100k kd troops faster.
Please dismiss our concerns and allow us to abuse it, but then it’s not an abuse it’s a design flaw and completely legal.
Deal?
It’s much easier to show than explain in words.
saadht I shouldn't respond to such a dumb response, but sure I'll take the bait.
If you could use this strategy with CLI, why didn't you already use it when there was no CLI? It's 10X easier to use that strategy without CLI in the way.
Because the one receiving castles was not getting prot. He could be hit by the others. Now he also gets protection.
- Edited
saadht well that's dumb, he could just let one of his buddies hit him for protection, duhhhhhh.
So the circle jerks feed the 1 guy a bunch of castles, then he gives 1 back for protection.
Duhhhhh
Not gonna respond, it’s much easier to show than to explain.
saadht if there was a legitimate flaw for us to consider, I'd be happy to hear it. So far, there's nothing.
CLI doesn't make this made up scenario easier, it makes it harder. CLI doesn't make this scenario possible, it's already currently possible.
- Edited
Lord Thane Well, I have in my queue avoid inter-province attacks, would be a little more difficult to adjust the Leo's scenario
That would be helpful. Because less incentive in a province based play. It is only possible within a province where players are well-organized or via multi. Disabling inter-province attack has been proposed many times now but i thought didn't get much popularity. It makes much more sense now with CLI.
Oh God, CLI B and No are 32% each.
I haven’t seen such polarization since Britain decided to commit suicide in 2016…
I've never seen such a meltdown. What a pity that Thardferr would come after 20 years just to see this yapping.
saadht I'm counting A + B together since it's both CLI, so vote is actually | 12 yes | 10 no | 
I live in Pakistan, I’m aware of these kinds rigged elections. Doesn’t matter what you vote for, it only matters who is counting the vote 
.
It’s your game man do as you’d like.
- Edited
- Edited
I do understand where your point is. This is why we have Message in game. You don't have allies, your not one of it? Then be one of it. Start looking for one. I get what you mean. As for the new comers, new players. I bet they already know the mechanics of the game before playing, sure enough they'll learn and look for one that they can depend on.
@Lord Thane You should combine CLI A and B for the poll. Then if it wins, separate them to determine which one gets implemented. Because right now they are leading when you add them together, which shows that a majority of people want something put in place. But separated, it looks like nothing changing leads. Do you know what I mean?